{"id":960,"date":"2019-11-12T16:13:48","date_gmt":"2019-11-12T16:13:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/?page_id=960"},"modified":"2021-10-14T05:43:52","modified_gmt":"2021-10-14T05:43:52","slug":"famous-quotes-in-the-law","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/?page_id=960","title":{"rendered":"Famous Quotes in the Law"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>This compendium of Legal Quotes \nwas first published at gGreen.com on March 22, 1995. It was last updated\n on December 17, 2018. It does not purport to be a list of all the Legal\n Quotes I have ever heard, just the ones I like. I have even excluded \nsome quotes that gave me pause when they also fell into the trap that \nsuggests lawyers, per se, are dishonest. I welcome additional \ncontributions, and will credit the source of new ones that pass \neditorial review.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>\u2013 Gary Green<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"1024\" src=\"http:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.26.11-AM.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1873\" srcset=\"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.26.11-AM.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.26.11-AM-150x150.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.26.11-AM-300x300.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.26.11-AM-768x768.jpeg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"1024\" src=\"http:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.25.34-AM-1024x1024.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1874\" srcset=\"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.25.34-AM-1024x1024.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.25.34-AM-150x150.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.25.34-AM-300x300.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.25.34-AM-768x768.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/WhatsApp-Image-2021-10-08-at-2.25.34-AM.jpeg 2000w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cbee care full win yew ewes spell checque:?.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em> \u2013 Pamela Pantsuit<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cBut the mere truth won\u2019t do. You must have a lawyer.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2013&nbsp;<em>Dr. Allan Woodcourt to the wrongly accused George Rouncewell, in Charles Dickens\u2019s&nbsp;Bleak House<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt could have been prevented. That is the message [to pharmaceutical companies]. Respect us.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Juror Derrick Chizer, who voted \nagainst Merck in the first Vioxx case to go to trial, who said the 10 \nlike-minded jurors believed a heart attack triggered the Plaintiff\u2019s \nfatal arrhythmia. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe first thing we do, let\u2019s kill all the lawyers.\u201d (Dick the Butcher to Jack Cade in <em>Henry VI, Part 2 (1592) act 4, sc. 2. \u2013 <\/em>Shakespeare\u2019s misquoted implication that lawyers stand in the way of tyranny<em>.<\/em>)<br>\n<em>\u2013 W. Shakespeare (1564-1616)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI shall not rest until every German sees that it is a shameful thing to be a lawyer.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Adolph Hitler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">___________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe future has several names. For the \nweak, it is impossible. For the fainthearted, it is unknown. For the \nthoughtful and valiant, it is ideal.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>-Victor Hugo<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">____________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThose whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>-Anonymous ancient proverb, wrongly attributed to Euripides. The version here is quoted as a \u201cheathen proverb\u201d in Daniel: A Model for Young Men (1854) by William Anderson Scott<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe love lawyers. If there weren\u2019t any lawyers, there wouldn\u2019t be any jokes!\u201d<br>\n<em>-Click and Clack<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Oliver Wendell Holmes<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhere law ends, tyranny begins.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William Pitt <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201c\u2026Freedom of religion; freedom of the press, and freedom of person \nunder the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries \nimpartially selected. These principles form the bright constellation \nwhich has gone before us and guided our steps through an age of \nrevolution and reformation. The wisdom of our sages and the blood of our\n heros have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed \nof our political faith.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address (1801)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cNo friend ever served me, and no enemy ever wronged me, whom I have not repaid in full.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2013 Self-dictated Epitaph of Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Sulla Felix); 78 B.C.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cFor 500 years the West patented six \nkiller applications that set it apart. The first to download them was \nJapan. Over the last century, one Asian country after another has \ndownloaded these killer apps- competition, modern science, the rule of \nlaw and private property rights, modern medicine, the consumer society \nand the work ethic. Those six things are the secret sauce of Western \ncivilization.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Harvard historian Niall Ferguson, Civilization: The West and the Rest <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cFiat justitia ruat caelum.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Latin phrase meaning \u201cLet justice \nbe done though the heavens fall\u201d; attributed to Lucius Calpurnius Piso \nCaesoninus, the father-in-law of Julius Caesar<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">______________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAs long as the world shall last there will be wrongs, and if no man \nobjected and if no man rebelled, those wrongs would last forever.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2013 Clarence Darrow (1857-1938), prominent American lawyer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cConsider the reason of the case, for nothing is law that is not reason.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 &nbsp;Sir John Powell <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIf you can learn a simple trick, Scout,\n you\u2019ll get along better with all kinds of folks. You never really \nunderstand a person until you consider things from his point of \nview\u2026until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Atticus Finch, in Harper Lee\u2019s&nbsp;To Kill a Mockingbird<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe jury system has come to stand for \nall we mean by English justice. The scrutiny of 12 honest jurors \nprovides defendants and plaintiffs alike a safeguard from arbitrary \nperversion of the law.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Winston Churchill<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe one governmental agency that has no ambition.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Justice William O. Douglas, on the Supreme Court<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI consider trial by jury as the only \nanchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to \nthe principles of its constitution.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Thomas Jefferson (1788)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLaws are the sovereigns of sovereigns.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Louis XIV<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>_____________________________________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe pen is mightier than the sword.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Edward Bulwer-Lytton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">_____________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhat I want is a competent lawyer who will counsel me. \u2026 I also need\n him with me at my trial and in hearings. \u2026 I would also like to be able\n to sue him if I later conclude that I have been defectively or \ninadequately counseled, because I feel that I have received less than \nsatisfactory service in the past. It occurs to me that \u2026 we each will \nfeel as though we are caged with a rattlesnake: There is going to be \nmutual fear, mistrust, dislike, and a contest for dominance. I don\u2019t \nconsider it my fault, however.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Randall S. Boyd of Denton, TX, in a prose motion seeking appointment of counsel<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">_____________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTo the wise, a word is sufficient.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Prince John Lackland, before the return of King Richard<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Truth is incontrovertible.&nbsp; Malice may attack it and ignorance may deride it, but, in the end, there it is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">____________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLife\u2019s real victories must be shared.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Former President Bill Clinton on the passing of Former President Nelson Mandela<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere\u2019s always room for a good lawyer.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Milas Hale&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA law is valuable not because it is law, but because there is right in it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Henry Ward Beecher <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIf you want peace, work for justice\u201d<br>\n\u2013 <em>Pope Paul VI<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLaws are the very bulkwarks of liberty; they define every man\u2019s rights, and defend the individual liberties of all men.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 J.G. Holland<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLaw is the embodiment of the moral sentiment of the people.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William Blackstone<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhen you\u2019re up to your nose in shit, keep your mouth shut.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Jack Beauregard, played by Henry Fonda. My Name is Nobody.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe safety of the people shall be the highest law.\u201d<br>\n\u2013 <em>Marcus Tullius Cicero<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cPlead the Fifth.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Gary Vert<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cJustice denied anywhere diminishes justice everywhere.\u201d<br>\n\u2013<em>Martin Luther King, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI would remind you that extremism in \nthe defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that \nmoderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Barry Goldwater<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cPredicting coding algorithms are \nalready able to do much of the legal research lawyers do. Before long, \n\u2018there will be many thousands of lawyers out of work,\u2019 one legal expert \ntold Pew. Don\u2019t all weep at once.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Rick Newman on the fate of lawyers, in his August 2014 article 28 Jobs Endangered by Technology, via Yahoo Finance<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhereas the law is passionless, passion must ever sway the heart of man.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Aristotle<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cEvery man is enthusiastic at times. One man has enthusiasm for 30 \nminutes, another man has it for 30 days. But it is the man who has it \nfor 30 years who makes a success in life.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Edward B. Butler<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cV. The next fpecies of trial is of great antiquity, but much \ndifuted; though ftill in force if the parties chufe to abide by it: I \nmean the trial by wager of battel. This feems to have owed it\u2019s original\n to the military fpirit of our anceftors, joined to a fuperftitious \nframe of mind; it being in the nature of an appeal to providence, under \nan apprehenfion and hope (however prefumptous and unwarrantable) that \nheaven would give the victory to him who had the right. The decifion of \nfuits, by this appeal to the God of battels, is by fome faid to have \nbeen invented by the Burgundi, one of the northern or German clans that \nplanted themfelves in Gaul. And it is true, that the firft written \ninjuction of judiciary combats that we meet with, is in the laws of \nGundebald, A. D. 501, which are preferved in the Burgundian code. Yet it\n does not feem to have been merely a local cuftom of this or that \nparticular tribe, but to have been the common ufage of all thofe warlike\n people from the earlieft times. And it may alfo feem from a paffage in \nVelleius Paterculus, that the Germans, when firft they became knwon to \nthe Romans, were wont to decide all contefts of right by the fword: for \nwhen Quintilius Varus endeavoured to introduce among them the Roman laws\n and method of trial, it was looked upon (fays the hiftorian) as a \n\u201cnovitas incognitae difciplinae, ut folita armis \u201cdecerni, jure \nterminarentur.\u201d And among the antient Goths in Sweden we find the \npractice of judiciary duels eftablifhed upon much the fame footing as \nthey formerly were in our own country.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>-\u201cA description of the \u201cgreat antiquity\u201d of \u201cthe trial by wager \nof battle\u201d from Blackstone\u2019s Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume\n III, p. 337 (1768)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 early-19th century proverb found in Henry Kett\u2019s&nbsp;The flowers of wit, or a choice collection of bon mots (1814)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAll bad precedents begin with justifiable measures.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Julius Ceasar \u2013 Sallust\u2019s Bellum Catilinae, J.T. Ramsey ed (1984)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe spirit of liberty is the spirit which is not too sure that it is right\u2026\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Judge Learned Hand <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI think the first duty of society is justice.\u201d<br>\n\u2013 <em>Alexander Hamilton<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTremble, all ye oppressors of the world!<br>\n<em>\u2013 Richard Price<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cRemember always that all of us\u2026are descended from immigrants and revolutionists.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Franklin D. Roosevelt <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTrue patriotism hates injustice in its own land more than anywhere else.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Clarence Darrow <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA majority held in restraint by \nconstitutional checks and limitations\u2026is the only true sovereign of a \nfree people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or to \ndespotism.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Abraham Lincoln <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhen you have no basis for an argument, abuse the plaintiff.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Cicero <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cBeware the smoke screen!\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Gary Vert<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cRight\u2026 is the child of law.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI wholly disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 S.G. Tallentyre, The Friends of Voltaire (1906)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTact is the ability to describe others as they see themselves.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Abraham Lincoln <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cArgument weak; speak loudly!\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 a handwritten note by Theodore Roosevelt in the margins of one of his speeches<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhen it wishes anything done \nwhich is really serious, it collects twelve of the ordinary men standing\n round. The same thing was done, if I remember right, by the Founder of \nChristianity.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 G. K. Chesterton, speaking of society<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cBy obliging men to turn their attention\n to other affairs than their own, it rubs off that private selfishness \nwhich is the rust of society.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 de Tocqueville on jury service<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt may be true that the law cannot make\n a man love me, but it can stop him from lynching me, and I think that\u2019s\n pretty important.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Martin Luther King, Jr.&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAn unlimited power to tax involves, necessarily, a power to destroy;\n because there is a limit beyond which no institution and no property \ncan bear taxation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Chief Justice John Marshall<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThese are the times that try men\u2019s souls.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Thomas Paine, \u201cThe Crises\u201d (published after Washington\u2019s army had to retreat from Long Island to Breucklyn)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTake to the study of the law. Possession is nine points of it, which thou hast of me. Self-possession is the tenth . . .\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 R.D. Blackmore, Lorna Doone<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cCome now, and let us reason together . . .\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013&nbsp;The Song of Solomon \u2013 Isaiah<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The wisdom of our sages and the blood of\n our heroes has been devoted to the attainment of trial by jury. It \nshould be the creed of our political faith.<br>\n<em>-Thomas Jefferson First Inaugural Address 1801<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere is sacredness in tears. They are \nnot the mark of weakness, but of power. They speak more eloquently than \nten thousand tongues. They are the messengers of overwhelming grief, of \ndeep contrition, and of unspeakable love.\u201d<br>\n\u2013<em>Washington Irving<\/em> (1783-1859)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cYou will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished by your anger.\u201d<br>\n\u2013 <em>Author Unknown<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cVery few souls are saved after the first five minutes of the sermon.\u201d<br>\n\u2013 <em>Mark Twain<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe law is reason free from passion.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Aristotle<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">SIR EDWARD COKE (1552-1634)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cReason is the life of the law; nay, the common law itself is nothing else but reason\u2026The law, which is perfection of reason.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 First Institute [1628]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cFor a man\u2019s house is his castle, et domus sua cuique tutissimum refugium.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Third Institute [1644]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe house of everyone is to him as his \ncastle and fortress, as well for his defense against injury and violence\n as for his repose.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Semayne\u2019s Case. 5 Report 91<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThey [corporations] cannot commit treason, nor be outlawed nor excommunicate, for they have no souls.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Case of Sutton\u2019s Hospital. 10 Report 32<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLearn to do right; seek justice, encourage the oppressed, defend the cause of the fatherless, plead the case of the widow.\u201d <em><br>\n \u2013 The Song of Solomon \u2013 Isaiah 1:17<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe Seventh Amendment to the \nConstitution of the United States: \u2018In Suits at common law, where the \nvalue in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by \njury shall be preserved and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise \nre-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the \nrules of the common law.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cNow see that noble and most sovereign reason,<br>\nLike sweet bells jangled, out of tune and harsh.<em><br>\n-Shakespeare: Hamlet III, i, 162<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLincoln\u2019s image is sometimes invoked as\n a model for lawyer advertising, with his advertising having been the \nfeature of at least one recent television campaign for legal services. \nOther times, he, obviously, is advanced as the highest example of \nprofessionalism. He is probably an excellent illustration of the ability\n of a lawyer in that era to combine aspects of commercialism, competence\n and dignity in the practice of law.\u201d<em><br>\n-American Bar Association, Commission on Advertising, Lawyer \nAdvertising at the Crossroads: Professional Policy Considerations 31-32 \n(1995).<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOur reason is our law.\u201d<em><br>\n-Milton: Paradise Lost, bk. IX, l. 652<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe sleep of reason produces monsters [El sue\u00f1o de la raz\u00f3n produce monstruos].\u201d<em><br>\n\u2013 Francisco Jos\u00e9 de Goya y Lucientes:&nbsp;Los Caprichos [1799]. Plate 43\u00b9<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cEducation is what you get by reading the fine print; experience is what you get if you don\u2019t read it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2013<em> from The Furrow, Volume 119, Issue 6<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Judge: \u201cIs there any reason you could not serve as a juror on this case?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Juror: \u201cI don\u2019t want to be away from my job that long.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Judge: \u201cCan\u2019t they do without you at work?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Juror: \u201cCertainly, but I don\u2019t want them to know it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 from The Furrow, Volume 119, Issue 6<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLawyers are like other people \u2014 fools on the average; but it is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013&nbsp;Mark Twain<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cMan is a reasoning animal.\u201d<em><br>\n-Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Epistles, 41,8<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cEternal vigilance is the price of liberty.\u201d <em><br>\n \u2013 Wendell Phillips (1811-1884), abolitionist, orator and columnist for The Liberator, in a speech before the Massachusetts Antislavery Society in 1852.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWoe to those who enact unjust statutes and who write oppressive decrees,<br>\ndepriving the needy of judgment and robbing my peoples\u2019 poor of their<br>\nrights, making widows their plunder, and orphans their prey.\u201d <em><br>\n \u2013 Isaiah 10:1-2.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cEach time a man stands up for an ideal,\n or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice,\n he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a \nmillion different centers of energy and daring those ripples build a \ncurrent which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and \nresistance.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Robert F. Kennedy (1925-1968, American Attorney General, Senator)<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAbout half the practice of a decent lawyer consists in telling would-be clients that they are damned fools and should stop.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Elihu Root<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA crooked thing is ruined and fit only to ruin everything else.&nbsp;<em>(Chose tourn\u00e9e est corrumpue et propre \u00e0 tout faire tourner par suite.)\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Guillaume le Mar\u00e9chal, III, 170<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201c[The law] is a jealous mistress, and \nrequires a long and constant courtship. It is not to be won by trifling \nfavors, but by lavish homage.\u201d <em><br>\nThe Value and Importance of Legal Studies<br>\n\u2013 Joseph Story, (1779-1845)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAll the sovereigns who have chosen to \ngovern by their own authority, and to direct society instead of obeying \nits directions, have destroyed or enfeebled the institution of the jury.\n The Tudor monarchs sent to prison jurors who refused to convict, and \nNapoleon caused them to be selected by his agents.\u201d<br>\n\u201cThe institution of the jury, if confined to criminal causes, is always \nin danger; but when once it is introduced into civil proceedings, it \ndefies the aggressions of time and man. If it had been as easy to remove\n the jury from the customs as from the laws of England, it would have \nperished under the Tudors, and the civil jury did in reality at that \nperiod save the liberties of England.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 de Tocqueville on civil jury trials<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 origin unknown; attributed to several sources but made especially popular by&nbsp;Mark Twain\u2019s Own Autobiography: The Chapters from the North American Review&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cStatistician. A person who draws a mathematically precise line between an unwarranted assumption and a foregone conclusion.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 author unknown<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cInjustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Martin Luther King, Jr.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe law is the last result of human wisdom acting upon human experience for the benefit of the public.\u201d <em><br>\n \u2013 Samuel Johnson <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is a fair summary of history to say \nthat the safeguards of liberty have frequently been forged in \ncontroversies involving not very nice people.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Justice Felix Frankfurter, dissenting, United States v. Rabinowitz (1950)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI used to say that, as Solicitor \nGeneral, I made three arguments of every case. First came the one that I\n planned\u2013as I thought, logical, coherent, complete. Second was the one \nactually presented\u2013interrupted, incoherent, disjointed, disappointing. \nThe third was the utterly devastating argument that I thought of after \ngoing to bed that night.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Robert H. Jackson, Advocacy Before the Supreme Court (1951)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cJudicial reform is no sport for the short-winded.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Arthur T. Vanderbilt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTo be a successful contingency attorney requires three things:&nbsp;1). \nAccept only good cases; 2). Settle the good cases; and 3). Try the \nrest.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em> \u2013 Gary Vert<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAnd do as adversaries do in law \u2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Strive mightily, but eat and drink as friends.<em><br>\n \u2013 William Shakespeare: The Taming of the Shrew \u2013 Act 1 Scene 2<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt usually takes three weeks to prepare a good impromptu speech.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Mark Twain <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe difference between the right word and the almost right word is the difference between lightning and a lightning bug.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Mark Twain <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cShould any political party attempt to \nabolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor \nlaws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our \npolitical history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that \nbelieves that you can do these things. Among them are a few Texas oil \nmillionaires, and an occasional politician or businessman from other \nareas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhat is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow; that is the whole Law: the rest is interpretation.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Hillel (30 B.C.- 10.A.D.) Source: Talm<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Seek justice for all . . . Champion the \ncause of those who deserve redress for injury to personal property . . .\n Promote the public good through concerted efforts to secure safe \nproducts, a safe work place, a clean environment, and quality healthcare\n . . . Further the rule of law in a civil justice system, and protect \nthe rights of the accused . . . Advance the common law and the finest \ntraditions of jurisprudence . . . and uphold the honor and dignity of \nthe legal profession and the highest standards of ethical conduct and \nintegrity.<em><br>\n\u2013 Mission Statement \u2013 Association of Trial Lawyers of America<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cHe has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.<br>\nHe has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.<br>\nHe has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to \nour constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to \ntheir Acts of pretended Legislation: . . . For depriving us in many \ncases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:\u201d<em><br>\n\u2013 List of Colonists\u2019 Grievances against King George III, Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe law must have the last word.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 French President Jacques Chirac in response to rioters in France November 6, 2005<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe study of law is sublime, and its practice vulgar.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Oscar Wilde<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cNo man is above the law and no man below it.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Theodore Roosevelt<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cJustice is conscience, not a personal \nconscience but the conscience of the whole humanity. Those who clearly \nrecognize the voice of their own conscience usually also recognize the \nvoice of justice.\u201d<br>\n\u2013 <em>Alexander Solzhenitsyn<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cSimple is good.\u201d<br>\n\u2013 <em>Jim Henson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe great enemy of the truth is very \noften not the lie \u2013 \u2013 deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth \u2013\n \u2013 persistent, persuasive, unrealistic.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 John F. Kennedy<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAs citizens of this democracy, you are \nthe rulers and the ruled, the law-givers and the law-abiding, the \nbeginning and the end.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Adlai Ewing Stevenson<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is better to risk saving a guilty person than to condemn an innocent one.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Voltaire, Zadig, 1747<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOur defense is not in our armaments, nor in science, nor in going underground. Our defense is in law and order.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Albert Einstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cUnkindness has no remedy at law.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Thomas Fuller (1654 \u2013 1734) comp., Gnomologia: Adages and Proverbs, 5402, 1732.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe precepts of the law are these: to \nlive honestly, to injure no one, and to give everyone his due.\u201d \nJustinian I (482\/483-565).<em><br>\n \u2013 Justinian Code, A.D. 533.<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere shall be one law for the native and for the stranger who sojourns among you.\u201d Moses (14th Century B.C.).<em><br>\n \u2013 Exodus 12:49<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThey that make laws must not break them.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 John Ray (1628 \u2013 1705). Comp., A Collection of English Proverbs, p. 166, 1678.<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIgnorance of the law excuses no man, \nnot that all men know the law, but \u2019tis an excuse every man will plead \nand no man can tell how to confute him.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 John Selden (1584 \u2013 1654). \u201cLAW\u201d (2), Table Talk, 1689, ed. Frederick Pollock, 1927.<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cPossession is nine-tenths of the law. Lord Mansfield (1705 \u2013 1793). <em><br>\n \u2013 Corporation of Kingston \u2013 upon \u2013 Hull v. Horner, 1774.<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe success of any legal system is \nmeasured by its fidelity to the universal ideal of justice.\u201d Earl Warren\n (1891 \u2013 1974). \u201cThe Law and the Future,\u201d <em><br>\n \u2013 Fortune Magazine, November 1955.<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLawyers with a weakness for seeing the merits of the other side end up being employed by neither.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 Richard J. Barnet (1929 \u2013 2004). Roots of War. 3.3, 1971.<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Saying<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">(Latin): The law is not concerned with trifles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The more laws, the less justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Where the law is uncertain, there is no law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">(Spanish): One lawyer makes work for another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">(German): A lawyer and a wagon wheel must be well greased.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is unwise to pay too much but it is \nworse to pay too little. When you pay too much you lose a little money. \nWhen you pay too little you sometimes lose everything because the thing \nyou bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to do. The \ncommon sense law of business balance prohibits paying a little and \ngetting a lot. It can\u2019t be done.\u201d<em><br>\n \u2013 John Ruskin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhen law and nature collide, nature usually wins.\u201d<em><br>\n\u2013 Forrest Reynolds, June 1, 2012, on discussing the verdict in the John Edwards case<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLawyers are just like physicians; what one says the other contradicts.<em><br>\n-Sholem Aleiche<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&nbsp;\u201cOne thing I have learned from this \nexperience is that it is hard to keep an audience attentive and involved\n with a \u201cspeech,\u201d but it\u2019s easy if you tell a story that involves your \nlisteners and inspires them with a memorable moral.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Jim M. Perdue<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cHe is no lawyer who cannot take two sides.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Charles Lamb<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cYou get a reasonable doubt for a reasonable price.\u201d<em><br>\n-Criminal attorney\u2019s saying<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLawyers help those who help themselves.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Anonymous<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is true that, of the people of my Gracious Prince here, some out \nof all offices and faculties must be executed: clerics, electoral \ncouncilors and doctors, city officials, court assessors, several of whom\n Your Grace knows. There are law students to be arrested. \u2026 The notary \nof our Church consistory, a very learned man, was yesterday arrested and\n put to the torture. In a word, a third part of the city is surely \ninvolved. The richest, most attractive, most prominent of the clergy are\n already executed. \u2026 I have seen put to death children of seven, \npromising students of ten, twelve, fourteen, and fifteen.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013A Letter from W\u00fcrzburg (1629), reprinted in Witchcraft in Europe 400-1700 353-54 (Alan Charles Kors and Edward Peters eds., University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLawyers are a learned class of very ignorant men.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>-Erasmus, Dutch philosopher and theologian&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI am not afraid of lawyers as I used to be. They are lambs in wolves\u2019 clothing.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Edna St. Vincent Millay<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIf you laid all of our laws end to end, there would be no end.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Mark Twain<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201c\u2018Curio vult advisari,\u2019 as the lawyers say; which means, \u2018Let us have another glass, and then we can think about it.&#8217;\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 R.D. Blackmore, Lorna Doone<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[<em>Curia advisari vult<\/em> is a Latin legal term meaning \u201cthe \ncourt wishes to consider the matter\u201d (literally, \u201cthe court wishes to be\n advised\u201d), a term reserving judgment until some subsequent day. It \noften appears in case reports, abbreviated as \u201cCur. adv. vult\u201d, or \nsometimes \u201cc.a.v.\u201d or \u201cCAV\u201d, when the bench takes time for deliberation \nafter hearing counsel\u2019s submissions.]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLaw is the second oldest profession.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Anonymous<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThus tis we say though quite uncivil, A cunning lawyer beats the devil!\u201d<br>\n<em>-Early American Rhyme<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cSometimes a man who deserves to be looked upon because he is a fool is despised only because he is a lawyer.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Montesquieu<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cMay you have a lawsuit in which you know you are right.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Spanish Gypsy curse<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cHe that loves the law will get his fill of it.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Scottish proverb<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere is no man so good, who, were he \nto submit all his thoughts and actions to the laws would not deserve \nhanging ten times in his life.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Michel de Montaigne<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cHe wastes his tears who weeps before the judge.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Italian proverb<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThat one hundred and fifty lawyers should do business together ought not to be expected.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Thomas Jefferson (referring to the U.S. Congress)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLove all men \u2013 except lawyers.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Irish proverb<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cPride only breeds quarrels, but wisdom is found in those who take advice\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Proverbs 13:10<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI, Lucius Titus, have written this my \ntestament without any lawyer, following my own natural reason rather \nthan excessive and miserable diligence.\u201d<br>\n<em>-The will of a citizen of Rome<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThey do tricks even I can\u2019t figure out.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Harry Houdini<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIf it weren\u2019t for the lawyers we wouldn\u2019t need them.\u201d<br>\n<em>-William Jennings Bryan<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cGreat management decisions make themselves\u201d<br>\n<em>-Bob Howe<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe very definition of a good award is that it gives dissatisfaction to both parties.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Goodman C. Sayers<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOur holding will be spelled out with \nsome specificity in the pages which follow but briefly stated it is \nthis: the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or \ninculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant \nunless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to \nsecure the privilege against self-incrimination. By custodial \ninterrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers\n after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his\n freedom of action in any significant way.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Earl Warren, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe power of a sonorous phrase to command uncritical acceptance has often been encountered in the law.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Calvert Magruder, \u201cMental and Emotional Disturbance in the Law of Torts,\u201d 49 Harvard -Law Review 1033, 1033 (1936)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI left law school more than 40 years ago, and I still have that dream \u2013 and not infrequently.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Paul Kelly on anxiety-producing exams <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Judge: Are you trying to show contempt for the court?<br>\nFlower Bell Lee [played by Mae West]: No, I\u2019m doing my best to hide it.<br>\n<em> \u2013 Mae West and W.C. Fields, My Little Chickadee (screenplay), 1940,\n quoted in The Wit and Wisdom of Mae West 51 (Joseph Weintraub ed. 1970)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA cent or a pepper corn, in legal estimation, would constitute a valuable consideration.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Nicholas Emery, Whitney v. Stearns, 16 Me. 394, 397 (1839)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cBut there is one way in this country in\n which all men are created equal-there is one human institution that \nmakes a pauper the equal of a Rockefeller, the stupid man the equal of \nan Einstein, and the ignorant man the equal of any college president. \nThat institution, gentlemen, is a court. It can be the Supreme Court of \nthe United State or the humblest J.P. court in the land, or this \nhonorable court which you serve. Our courts have their faults, as does \nany human institution, but in this country our courts are the great \nlevelers, and in our courts all men are created equal.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird 218 (1960)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is not enough to say, that in the \nopinion of the court, the damages are too high and that we would have \ngiven much less. It is the judgment of the jury, and not the judgment of\n the court, which is to assess the damages in actions for personal torts\n and injuries\u2026.The damages, therefore, must be so excessive as to strike\n mankind, at first blush, as being beyond all measure, unreasonable and \noutrageous, and such as manifestly show the jury to have been actuated \nby passion, partiality, prejudice, or corruption. In short, the damages \nmust be flagrantly outrageous and extravagant, or the court cannot \nundertake to draw the line; for they have no standard by which to \nascertain the excess.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 James Kent, Coleman v. Southwick, 9 Johns. 45, 51-52 (N.Y. 1818)<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cMore truly characteristic of dissent is\n a dignity, an elevation, of mood and thought and phrase. Deep \nconviction and warm feeling are saying their last say with knowledge \nthat the cause is lost. The voice of the majority may be that of force \ntriumphant, content with the plaudits of the hour, and recking little of\n the morrow. The dissenter speaks to the future, and his voice is \npitched to a key that will carry through the years.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Benjamin N. Cardozo, Law and Literature 36 (1931)<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It shall be unlawful for any teacher in \nany of the Universitis [sic], Normals and all other public schools of \nthe State which are supported in whole or in part by the public school \nfunds of the State, to teach any theory that denies the story of the \nDivine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that\n man has descended from a lower order of animals.<br>\n<em> \u2013 Act of Mar. 13, 1925, ch. 27, \u00a7 1, 1925 Tenn. Pub. Acts 50, 50-51<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA grand jury would \u2018indict a ham sandwich,\u2019 if that\u2019s what you wanted.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Tom Wolfe (quoting New York State chief judge Sol Wachtler) in&nbsp;The Bonfire of the Vanities<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIf today you can take a thing like \nevolution and make it a crime to teach it in the public school, tomorrow\n you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools, and the \nnext year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the \nchurch. At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers. Soon \nyou may set Catholic against Protestant and Protestant against \nProtestant, and try to foist your own religion upon the minds of men. If\n you can do one you can do the other. Ignorance and fanaticism is ever \nbusy and needs feeding. Always it is feeding and gloating for more. \nToday it is the public school teachers, tomorrow the private. The next \nday the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the \nnewspapers. After while, your honor, it is the setting of man against \nman and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums \nwe are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth century \nwhen bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any \nintelligence and enlightment and culture to the human mind.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Clarence S. Darrow, Speech at Scopes Trial, Dayton, Tenn., 13 July 1925, in The World\u2019s Most Famous Court Trial 87 (1925)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThose who want the Government to \nregulate matters of the mind and spirit are like men who are so afraid \nof being murdered that they commit suicide to avoid assassination.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Harry S. Truman, Address at the National Archives, Washington, \nD.C., 15 Dec., 1952, in Public Papers of the Presidents: Harry S. \nTruman, 1952-53, at 1077, 1079 (1966)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cSince the earliest days philosophers \nhave dreamed of a country where the mind and spirit of man would be \nfree; where there would be no limits to inquiry; where men would be free\n to explore the unknown and to challenge the most deeply rooted beliefs \nand principles. Our First Amendment was a bold effort to adopt this \nprinciple \u2013 to establish a country with no legal restrictions of any \nkind upon the subjects people could investigate, discuss and deny. The \nFramers knew, better perhaps than we do today, the risks they were \ntaking. They knew that free speech might be the friend of change and \nrevolution. But they also knew that it is always the deadliest enemy of \ntyranny. With this knowledge they still believed that the ultimate \nhappiness and security of a nation lies in its ability to explore, to \nchange, to grow and ceaselessly to adapt itself to new knowledge born of\n inquiry free from any kind of governmental control over the mind and \nspirit of man. Loyalty comes from love of good government, not fear of a\n bad one.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Hugo L. Black, \u201cThe Bill of Rights,\u201d 35 New York University Law Review 865, 880-81 (1960)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe issue of a cause rarely depends \nupon a speech and is but seldom even affected by it. But there is never a\n cause contested, the result of which is not mainly dependent upon the \nskill with which the advocate conducts his cross-examination.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">. . .<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA good advocate should be a good actor. The most cautious \ncross-examiner will often elicit a damaging answer. Now is the time for \nthe greatest self-control. If you show by your face how the answer hurt,\n you may lose your case by that one point alone. How often one sees the \ncross-examiner fairly staggered by such an answer. He pauses, perhaps \nblushes, and after he has allowed the answer to have its full effect, \nfinally regains his self-possession, but seldom his control of the \nwitness\u2026..\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 \u201cFrancis Wellman\u201d \u201cThe Art of Cross-Examination (1903, 1904)\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe practice of law is a busyness.\u201d<br>\n<em> -Gary Vert<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe can imagine . . . no better way to \ncounter a flag-burner\u2019s message than by saluting the flag that burns. . .\n We do not consecrate the flag by punishing its desecration, for in \ndoing so we dilute the freedom that this cherished emblem represents.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 William J. Brennan, Jr. Texas v. Johnson, 109 S. Ct. 2533, 2547-48 (1989)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is a pleasant world we live in, sir,\n a very pleasant world. There are bad people in it, Mr. Richard, but if \nthere were no bad people, there would be no good lawyers.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Charles Dickens, The Old Curiosity Shop<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cYou can only protect your liberties in this world by protecting the other man\u2019s freedom. You can only be free if I am free.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Clarence S. Darrow, Address to jury, Communist Trial, 1920, in Attorney for the Damned 121, 140 (Arthur Weinberg ed. 1957)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAnd I honor the man who is willing to sink<br>\nHalf his present repute for the freedom to think,<br>\nAnd, when he has thought, be his cause strong or weak,<br>\nWill risk t\u2019 other half for the freedom to speak.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 James Russell Lowell, \u201cA Fable for Critics,\u201d 1848, in Complete \nPoetical Works of James Russell Lowell 114, 136 (Horace E. Scudder ed. \n1925)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe wisest thing to do with a fool is \nto encourage him to hire a hall and discourse to his fellow-citizens. \nNothing chills nonsense like exposure to the air.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Woodrow Wilson, Constitutional Government in the United States 38 (1908)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThat the freedom of the press is one of\n the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained but by \ndespotic governments.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776, \u00a7 12, in Federal and State Constitutions 7:3812, 3814 (Francis N. Thorpe ed. 1909)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cFreedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 A.J. Liebling, \u201cThe Wayward Press: Do you belong in Journalism?\u201d New Yorker, 14 May 1960, at 105, 109<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Injustice anywhere is a threat to \njustice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of \nmutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one \ndirectly, affects all indirectly.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Martin Luther King, Jr., \u201cLetter from Birmingham Jail,\u201d 16 Apr. 1963, in Why We Can\u2019t Wait 77, 79 (1964)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe disclaim altogether any jurisdiction\n in the courts of the United States upon the subject of divorce, or for \nthe allowance of alimony.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 James M. Wayne, Barber v. Barber, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 582, 584 (1858)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThat in controversies respecting \nproperty, and in suits between man and man, the ancient trial by jury is\n preferable to any other, and ought to be held sacred.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776, \u00a7 11, in Federal and State Constitutions 7:3812, 3814 (Francis N. Thorpe ed. 1909)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhere there is Hunger, Law is not regarded; and where Law is not regarded, there will be Hunger.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard\u2019s Almanack, 1755, in Papers of Benjamin Franklin 5:472 (Leonard W. Labaree ed. 1962)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIgnorance of the law is no excuse in \nany country. If it were, the laws would lose their effect, because it \ncan always be pretended.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Andre Limozin, 22 Dec. 1787, in Papers of Thomas Jefferson 12:451 (Julian P. Boyd ed. 1955)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI know no method to secure the repeal of bad or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent execution.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Ulysses S. Grant, First Inaugural Address, 4 Mar. 1869, in \nMessages and Papers of the Presidents 7:6, 6 (James D. Richardson ed. \n1898)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cNever fear the want of business. A man who qualifies himself well for his calling never fails of employment in it.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Peter Carr, 22 June 1792, in Writings of Thomas Jefferson 6:92 (Paul L. Ford ed. 1895)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOur profession is good, if practiced in\n the spirit of it; it is damnable fraud and iniquity when its true \nspirit is supplied by a spirit of mischief-making and money catching.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Daniel Webster, Letter to James Hervey Bingham, 19 Jan. 1806, in Papers of Daniel Webster: Legal Papers 1.69<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[When advised not to become a lawyer because the profession was overcrowded:] \u201cThere is always room at the top.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Daniel Webster, quoted in Edward Latham, Famous Sayings and Their Authors 65 (1904)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhatever their failings as a class may \nbe, and however likely to lose their immortal souls, lawyers do not \ngenerally lose papers.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Arthur Train, \u201cHocus-Pocus,\u201d in Tut, Tut! Mr. Tutt 119, 120 (1923)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLook well to the right of you, look well to the left of you, for one of you three won\u2019t be here next year.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Edward H. Warren, quoted in W. Barton Leach, \u201cLook Well to the Right\u2026,\u201d 58 Harvard Law Review 1137, 1138 (1945)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On one occasion a student made a \ncuriously inept response to a question from Professor Warren. \u201cThe Bull\u201d\n roared at him, \u201cYou will never make a lawyer. You might just as well \npack up your books now and leave the school.\u201d The student rose, gathered\n his notebooks, and started to leave, pausing only to say in full voice,\n \u201cI accept your suggestion, Sir, but I do not propose to leave without \ngiving myself the pleasure of telling you to go plumb straight to Hell.\u201d\n \u201cSit down, Sir, sit down,\u201d said \u201cThe Bull.\u201d \u201cYour response makes it \nclear that my judgment was too hasty.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Joseph N. Welch, \u201cEdward Henry Warren,\u201d 58 Harvard Law Review 1134, 1136 (1945)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThey have a proverb here [in London], \nwhich I do not know how to account for ; \u2013 in speaking of a difficult \npoint, they say, it would puzzle a Philadelphia lawyer*.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 \u201cA Humorous Description of the Manners and Fashions of London; in\n a Letter from a Citizen of America to his Correspondent in \nPhiladelphia,\u201d 2 Columbian Magazine 181, 182 (1788) *This is the \nearliest known usage of the phrase Philadelphia lawyer to mean \u201ca shrewd\n lawyer expert in legal technicalities.\u201d This term may have been \ninspired by Philadelphia attorney Andrew Hamilton\u2019s successful defense \nof John Peter Zenger in a New York court in 1735.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Searching for quotations on lawyers, I found this on your site:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThey have a proverb here [in London], \nwhich I do not know how to account for ; \u2013 in speaking of a difficult \npoint, they say, it would puzzle a Philadelphia lawyer*.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 \u201cA Humorous Description of the \nManners and Fashions of London; in a Letter from a Citizen of America to\n his Correspondent in Philadelphia,\u201d 2 Columbian Magazine 181, 182 \n(1788) *This is the earliest known usage of the phrase Philadelphia \nlawyer to mean \u201ca shrewd lawyer expert in legal technicalities.\u201d This \nterm may have been inspired by Philadelphia attorney Andrew Hamilton\u2019s \nsuccessful defense of John Peter Zenger in a New York court in 1735.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is a much earlier use of \n\u201cPhiladelphia lawyer\u201d. The Gospel of Luke, in KJV, refers to \u201ca certain \nlawyer\u201d who asked \u201cWho is my neighbor?\u201d [\u201cTo whom do I owe a duty of \ncare?\u201d] Other translations say that \u201cthe lawyer of Philadelphia\u201d asked \nthis question. The city called Philadelphia in Bible times is the city \nnow known as Amman, Jordan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I learned this in New Testament Studies at Pacific Lutheran University here in Tacoma, Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Theresa Tilton, Attorney at Law<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">**************************************<br>\n<strong>Luke 10:25-37 (King James Version)<\/strong><br>\n<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.biblegateway.com\/versions\/?action=getVersionInfo&amp;vid=9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">King James Version<\/a> (KJV)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? <\/strong><br>\nHe said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?<br>\nAnd he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy \nheart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all \nthy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.<br>\nAnd he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.<br>\n<strong>But he, willing to justify himself, said unto Jesus, And who is my neighbour?<\/strong><br>\nAnd Jesus answering said, A certain man went down from Jerusalem to \nJericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and \nwounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead.<br>\nAnd by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.<br>\nAnd likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.<br>\nBut a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him,<br>\nAnd went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and \nset him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of \nhim.<br>\nAnd on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them\n to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou \nspendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.<br>\nWhich now of these three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?<br>\nAnd he said, He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLet me not be thought as intending \nanything derogatory to the profession of the law, or to the \ndistinguished members of that illustrious order. Well am I aware that we\n have in this ancient city innumerable worthy gentlemen, the \nknights-errant of modern days, who go about redressing wrongs and \ndefending the defenseless, not for the love of filthy lucre, nor the \nselfish cravings of renown, but merely for the pleasure of doing good. \nSooner would I throw this trusty pen into the flames and cork up my ink \nbottle forever, than infringe even for a nail\u2019s breadth upon the dignity\n of these truly benevolent champions of the distressed. On the contrary,\n I allude merely to those caitiff scouts who, in these latter days of \nevil, infest the skirts of the profession, as did the recreant Cornish \nknights of yore the honorable order of chivalry, \u2013 who under its \nauspices, commit flagrant wrongs, \u2013 who thrive by quibbles, by quirks \nand chicanery, and like vermin increase the corruption in which they are\n engendered.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Washington Irving, The History of New York 261-62 (1868) (1809)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA French observer is surprised to hear \nhow often an English or an American lawyer quotes the opinions of \nothers, and how little he alludes to his own; \u2026 This abnegation of his \nown opinion, and this implicit deference to the opinion of his \nforefathers, which are common to the English and American lawyer, this \nservitude of thought which he is obliged to profess, necessarily give \nhim more timid habits and more conservative inclinations in England and \nAmerica than in France.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America 1:353 (Francis Bowen trans. 1862) (1835)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe good judge is not he who does \nhair-splitting justice to every allegation, but who, aiming at \nsubstantial justice, rules something intelligible for the guidance of \nsuitors. The good lawyer is not the man who has an eye to every side and\n angle of contingency, and qualifies all his qualifications, but who \nthrows himself on your part so heartily that he can get you out of a \nscrape.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Ralph Waldo Emerson, \u201cPower,\u201d The Conduct of Life, 1860, in Complete Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson 6:53, 76 (1904)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cYour law may be perfect, your knowledge\n of human affairs may be such as to enable you to apply it with wisdom \nand skill, and yet without individual acquaintance with men, their \nhaunts and habits, the pursuit of the profession becomes difficult, \nslow, and expensive. A lawyer who does not know men is handicapped.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Louis D. Brandeis, Letter to William H. Dunbar, 2 Feb. 1893, in \nLetters of Louis D. Brandeis 1:108 (Melvin I. Urofsky and David W. Levy \neds. 1971)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cCourage is the most important attribute\n of a lawyer. It is more important than competence or vision. It can \nnever be an elective in any law school. It can never be de-limited, \ndated or outworn, and it should pervade the heart, the halls of justice \nand the chambers of the mind.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Robert F. Kennedy, Speech at University of San Francisco Law \nSchool, San Francisco, 29 Sept. 1962, quoted in Sue G. Hall, The \nQuotable Robert F. Kennedy 111 (1967)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOne hires lawyers as on hires plumbers, because one wants to keep one\u2019s hands off the beastly drains.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Amanda Cross, The Question of Max 61 (1976)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cSend lawyers, guns and money, the shit has hit the fan.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Warren Zevon, \u201cLawyers, Guns and Money\u2019 (song) (1978)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cSome debts are not to be reckoned.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Thomas Cromwell, played by Mark Rylance,&nbsp;on PBS\u2019s&nbsp;Wolf Hall,&nbsp;Season 1 Episode 2&nbsp;(2015)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe lawyers\u2019 contribution to the \ncivilizing of humanity is evidenced in the capacity of lawyers to argue \nfuriously in the courtroom, then sit down as friends over a drink or \ndinner. This habit is often interpreted by the layman as a mark of their\n ultimate corruption. In my opinion, it is their greatest moral \nachievement: It is a characteristic of humane tolerance that is most \ndesperately needed at the present time.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em> \u2013 John R. Silber, quoted in Wall Street Journal, 16 Mar. 1972, at 14<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAnyone who believes a better day dawns \nwhen lawyers are eliminated bears the burden of explaining who will take\n their place. Who will protect the poor, the injured, the victims of \nnegligence, the victims of racial violence?\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 John J. Curtin, Jr., Remarks to American Bar Association, Atlanta, 13 Aug. 1991, quoted in Time, 26 Aug. 1991, at 54<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLawyers, Preachers, and Tomtits Eggs, there are more of them hatch\u2019d than come to perfection.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard\u2019s Almanack, 1734, in Papers of Benjamin Franklin 1:354 (Leonard W. Labaree ed. 1959)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI should apologize, perhaps, for the \nstyle of this bill. I dislike the verbose and intricate style of the \nEnglish statutes, and in our revised code I endeavored to restore it to \nthe simple one of the ancient statues, in such original bills as I drew \nin that work. I suppose the reformation has not been acceptable, as it \nhas been little followed. You, however, can easily correct this bill to \nthe taste of my brother lawyers, by making every other word a \u201csaid\u201d or \n\u201caforesaid,\u201d and saying everything over two or three times, so that \nnobody but we of the craft can untwist the diction, and find out what it\n means; and that, too, not so plainly but that we may conscientiously \ndivide one half on each side. Mend it, therefore, in form and substance \nto the orthodox taste, and make it what it should be; or, if you think \nit radically wrong, try something else, and let us make a beginning in \nsome way. No matter how wrong, experience will amend it as we go along, \nand make it effectual in the end.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Joseph C. Cabell, 9 Sept. 1817, in \nWritings of Thomas Jefferson 17:417-18 (Andrew A. Lipscomb ed. 1904)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere are two things wrong with almost all legal writing. One is its style. The other is its content.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Fred Rodell, \u201cGoodbye to Law Reviews,\u201d 23 Virginia Law Review 38, 38 (1936)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLaws are sand, customs are rock. Laws \ncan be evaded and punishment escaped, but an openly transgressed custom \nbrings sure punishment.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Mark Twain, \u201cThe Gorky Incident,\u201d 1906, in Mark Twain: Letters From the Earth 155, 156 (Bernard De Voto ed. 1939)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhat we need to do is to stop passing \nlaws. We have enough laws now to govern the world for the next 10,000 \nyears. Every crank who has a foolish notion that he would like to impose\n upon everybody else hastens to some legislative body and demands that \nit be graven upon the statutes. Every fanatic who wants to control his \nneighbor\u2019s conduct is here or at some other legislative body demanding \nthat a law be passed to regulate that neighbor\u2019s conduct.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 James A. Reed, in 67 Congressional Record 10,708 (1926)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe government of the United States has\n been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. It will \ncertainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no\n remedy for the violation of a vested legal right.\u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 163 (1803)<br>\nSee also OBEDIENCE TO LAW 2, OBEDIENCE TO LAW 3<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIn the United States, every one is \npersonally interested in enforcing the obedience of the whole community \nto the law; for as the minority may shortly rally the majority to its \nprinciples, it is interested in professing that respect for the decrees \nof the legislator which it may soon have occasion to claim for its own. \nHowever irksome an enactment may be, the citizen of the United States \ncomplies with it, not only because it is the work of the majority, but \nbecause it is his own, and he regards it as a contract to which he is \nhimself a party. \u201d<br>\n<em> \u2013 Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America 1:317 (Francis Bowen trans. 1862) (1835)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAs [a citizen] is a \u201claw-maker,\u201d he \nshould not be a \u201claw-breaker,\u201d for he ought to be conscious that every \ndeparture from the established ordinances of society is an infraction of\n his rights. His power can only be maintained by the supremacy of the \nlaws, as in monarchies, the authority of the king is asserted by \nobedience to his orders. The citizen in lending a cheerful assistance to\n the ministers of the law, on all occasions, is merely helping to \nmaintain his own power. This feature in particular, distinguishes the \ncitizen from the subject.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 James Fenimore Cooper, The American Democrat 83 (1956) (1838) <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA very wise father once remarked, that \nin the government of his children, he forbade as few things as possible;\n a wise legislation would do the same. It is folly to make laws on \nsubjects beyond human prerogative, knowing that in the very nature of \nthings they must be set aside. To make laws that man can not and will \nnot obey, serves to bring all law into contempt. It is very important in\n a republic, that the people should respect the laws, for if we throw \nthem to the winds, what becomes of civil government?\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Address before 10th National Woman\u2019s \nrights Convention, New York, May 1860, in History of Woman Suffrage \n1:716, 721 (Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Matilda J. \nGage eds. 1881)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe words which are criticized as dirty\n <\/p>\n\n\n<p>[in James Joyce\u2019s Ulysses]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"> are old Saxon words known to almost all men \nand, I venture, to many women, and are such words as would be naturally \nand habitually used, I believe, by the types of folk whose life, \nphysical, and mental, Joyce is seeking to describe. In respect of the \nrecurrent emergence of the theme of sex in the minds of his characters, \nit must always be remembered that his locale was Celtic and his season \nspring.\u201d<br><em>\u2013 John M. Woolsey, United States v. One Book Called \u201cUlysses,\u201d 5 F. Supp. 182, 183-84 (S.D.N.Y. 1933)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[Standard for obscenity:]\u201d Whether to \nthe average person, applying contemporary community standards, the \ndominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to prurient \ninterest.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William J. Brennan, Jr. Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 489 (1957)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI have reached the conclusion . . . \nthat under the First and Fourteenth Amendments criminal laws in this \narea [obscenity] are constitutionally limited to hard-core pornography. I\n shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I \nunderstand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps\n I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know if when I \nsee it; and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197 (1964) (concurring)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe First Amendment guarantees liberty \nof human expression in order to preserve in our Nation what Mr. Justice \nHolmes called a \u201cfree trade in ideas.\u201d To that end, the Constitution \nprotects more than just a man\u2019s freedom to say or write or publish what \nhe wants. It secures as well the liberty of each man to decide for \nhimself what he will read and to what he will listen. The Constitution \nguarantees, in short, a society of free choice.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Potter Stewart, Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629, 649 (1968) (concurring)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe term \u201cf\u2014\u2013g pigs\u201d in the context in \nwhich it was used referred not to copulation of porcine animals but was \nrather a highly insulting epithet directed to the police \nofficers\u2026..Appellant\u2019s use of the vulgarism describing the filial \npartner in an oedipal relationship is fairly to be viewed as an epithet \nrather than as a phrase appealing to a shameful or morbid interest in \nintra-family sex\u2026.There is, after all, a strong possibility that an \nexpert witness called in the matter before us might have testified to \nthe occasional use of the offending profane adjective in bar association\n quarters or in trial judges\u2019 lounges-alas, all too often in reference \nto a decision of the Court of Appeal.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Robert S. Thompson, People v. Price, 4 Cal. App. 3d 941, 948-49, 84 Cal. Rptr. 585 (1970) (dissenting)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI put sixteen years into that damn \nobscenity thing. I tried and I tried, and I waffled back and forth, and I\n finally gave up. If you can\u2019t define it, you can\u2019t prosecute people for\n it. And that\u2019s why, in the Paris Adult Theatre decision, I finally \nabandoned the whole effort. I reached the conclusion that every \ncriminal-obscenity statute-and most obscenity laws are criminal-was \nnecessarily unconstitutional, because it was impossible, from the \nstatute, to define obscenity. Accordingly, anybody charged with \nviolating the statute would not have known that his conduct was a \nviolation of the law. He wouldn\u2019t know whether the material was obscene \nuntil the court told him.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William J. Brennan, Jr., quoted in Nat Hentoff, \u201cProfiles: The Constitutionalist,\u201d New Yorker, 12 Mar. 1990, at 45, 56<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe appellant has attempted to \ndistinguish the factual situation in this case from that in Renfroe v. \nHiggins Rack Coating and Manufacturing Co., Inc. (1969), 17 Mich App \n259. He didn\u2019t. We couldn\u2019t.<br>\nAffirmed. Costs to appellee.\u201d<br>\nAll concurred.*<br>\n<em>\u2013 John H. Gillis, Denny v. Radar Industries, 28 Mich. App. 294, 294 (1970)<br>\n* This is the opinion in its entirety.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cLiterary license allows an avid \nalliterationist authority to postulate parenthetically that the \npredominating principles presented here may be summarized thusly: \nPreventing public pollution permits promiscuous perusal of personality \nbut persistent perspicacious patron persuasively provided pertinent \nperdurable preponderating presumption precedent preventing prison.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 H. Sol Clark, Banks v. State, 132 Ga. App. 809, 810, 209 S.E. 2d 252 (1974)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOur amended Constitution is the \nlodestar for our aspirations. Like every text worth reading, it is not \ncrystalline. The phrasing is broad and the limitations of its provisions\n are not clearly marked. Its majestic generalities and ennobling \npronouncements are both luminous and obscure. This ambiguity of course \ncalls forth interpretation, the interaction of reader and text. The \nencounter with the Constitutional text has been, in many senses, my \nlife\u2019s work.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William J. Brennan, Jr., \u201cThe Constitution of the United States: \nContemporary Ratification\u201d (speech), Washington, D.C. 12 Oct. 1985, in \nOriginal Meaning Jurisprudence: A Sourcebook 151, 152 (1987)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI, Andrew Johnson, \u2026..hereby proclaim \nand declare unconditionally, and without reservation, to all and to \nevery person who directly or indirectly participated in the late \ninsurrection or rebellion, a full pardon and amnesty for the offence of \ntreason against the United States, or of adhering to their enemies \nduring the late civil war, with restoration of all rights, privileges, \nand immunities under the Constitution and the laws which have been made \nin pursuance thereof.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Proclamation 25 Dec., 1868, 15 Stat. 711, 712<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe patent system\u2026added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Abraham Lincoln, Second Lecture on Discoveries and Inventions, \nJacksonville, Ill., 11 Feb.1859, in Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, \n3:363 (Roy P. Basler ed. 1953)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[To the Court requesting a precedent for\n his position during the Crafts trial:] \u201cI will look, your Honor, and \nendeavor to find a precedent, if you require it; though it would seem to\n be a pity that the Court should lose the honor of being the first to \nestablish so just a rule.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Rufus Choate, quoted in Works of Rufus Choate 1:292 (Samuel G. Brown ed. 1862)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe recognize that stare decisis \nembodies an important social policy. It represents an element of \ncontinuity in law, and is rooted in the psychologic need to satisfy \nreasonable expectations. But stare decisis is a principle of policy and \nnot a mechanical formula of adherence to the latest decision, however \nrecent and questionable, when such adherence involves collision with a \nprior doctrine more embracing in its scope, intrinsically sounder, and \nverified by experience\u2026This Court, unlike the House of Lords, has from \nthe beginning rejected a doctrine of disability at self-correction.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Felix Frankfurter, Helvering v. Hallock, 309 U.S. 106, 119, 121 (1940)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI would rather create a precedent than find one.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William O. Douglas, The Court Years: 1939-1975, at 179 (1980)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe right to be let alone is indeed the beginning of all freedom.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William O. Douglas, Public Utilities Comm\u2019n v. Pollak, 343 U.S. 451, 467 (1952) (dissenting)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe are rapidly entering the age of no \nprivacy, where everyone is open to surveillance at all times; where \nthere are no secrets from government.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William O. Douglas, Osborn v. United States, 385 U.S. 323, 341 (1966) (dissenting)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIn no country in the world is the love \nof property more active and more anxious than in the United States; \nnowhere does the majority display less inclination for those principles \nwhich threaten to alter, in whatever manner, the laws of property.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America 2:314 (Francis Bowen trans.1862) (1835)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAny person who is the head of a family,\n or who has arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and is a citizen of \nthe United States, or who shall have filed his declaration of intention \nto become such, as required by the naturalization laws of the United \nStates, and who has never borne arms against the United States \nGovernment or given aid and comfort to its enemies, shall, from and \nafter the first January, eighteen hundred and sixty-three, be entitled \nto enter one quarter section or a less quantity of unappropriated public\n lands, upon which said person may have filed a preemption claim, or \nwhich may, at the time the application is made, be subject to preemption\n at one dollar and twenty-five cents, or less, per acre; or eighty acres\n or less of such unappropriated lands, at two dollars and fifty cents \nper acre, to be located in a body, in conformity to the legal \nsubdivisions of the public lands, and after the same shall have been \nsurveyed.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Homestead Act of 1862, ch. 75, \u00a7 1, 12 Stat. 392, 392<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWith the rise of property, considered \nas an institution, with the settlement of its rights, and, above all, \nwith the established certainty of its transmission to lineal \ndescendants, came the first possibility among mankind of the true family\n in its modern acceptation. . . It is impossible to separate property, \nconsidered in the concrete, from civilization, or for civilization to \nexist without its presence, protection, and regulated inheritance. Of \nproperty in this sense, all barbarous nations are necessarily ignorant.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Lewis Henry Morgan, Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity 492 (1870)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe primary duty of a lawyer engaged in public prosecution is not to convict, but to see that justice is done.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Canons of Professional Ethics Canon 5 (1908)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[William Jennings Bryan:] \u201cYour Honor, I\n think I can shorten this testimony. The only purpose Mr. Darrow has is \nto slur at the Bible, but I will answer his question. I will answer it \nall at once, and I have no objection in the world, I want the world to \nknow that this man, who does not believe in a God, is trying to use a \ncourt in Tennessee-\u201d<br>\n[Clarence S. Darrow:]\u201d I object to that.\u201d<br>\n[Bryan:]\u201d to slur at it, and while it will require time, I am willing to take it.\u201d<br>\n[Darrow:] \u201cI object to your statement. I am exempting you on your fool ideas that no intelligent Christian on earth believes.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Clarence S. Darrow, Scopes Trial, Dayton, Tenn., 20 July 1925, in The World\u2019s Most Famous Court Trial 304 (1925)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cMen may believe what they cannot prove.\n They may not be put to the proof of their religious doctrines or \nbeliefs. Religious experiences which are as real as life to some may be \nincomprehensible to others.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William O. Douglas, United States v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78, 86 (1944)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAmong religions in this country which \ndo not teach what would generally be considered a belief in the \nexistence of God are Buddhism, Taoism, Ethical Culture, Secular Humanism\n and others.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Hugo L. Black, Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488, 495 n.11 (1961)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThis country, with its institutions, \nbelongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of \nthe existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of\n amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember, or overthrow \nit.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, 4 Mar. 1861, in Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln 4:269 (Roy P. Basler ed. 1953)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe word \u201crevolution\u201d has of course \nacquired a subversive connotation in modern times. But it has roots that\n are eminently respectable in American history. This country is the \nproduct of revolution. Our very being emphasizes that when grievances \npile high and there are no political remedies, the exercise of sovereign\n powers reverts to the people. Teaching and espousing revolution-as \ndistinguished from indulging in overt acts-are therefore obviously \nwithin the range of the First Amendment. \u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William O. Douglas, W.E.B. Du Bois Clubs v. Clark, 389 U.S. 309, 315-16 (1967) <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIf we cannot secure all our rights, let us secure what we can.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Thomas Jefferson, Letter to James Madison, 15 Mar. 1789, in Papers of Thomas Jefferson 14:660 (Julian P. Boyd ed. 1958)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cBut the word \u201cright\u201d is one of the most\n deceptive of pitfalls; it is so easy to slip from a qualified meaning \nin the premise to an unqualified one in the conclusion. Most rights are \nqualified. \u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., American Bank and Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 256 U.S. 350, 358 (1921)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThis freedom of movement is the very \nessence of our free society, setting us apart. Like the right of \nassembly and the right of association, it often makes all other rights \nmeaningful-knowing, studying, arguing, exploring, conversing, observing \nand even thinking. Once the right to travel is curtailed, all other \nrights suffer, just as when curfew or home detention is placed on a \nperson.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William O. Douglas, Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. 500, 520 (1964) (concurring)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAmerica is of course sovereign; but her\n sovereignty is woven in an international web that makes her one of the \nfamily of nations. The ties with all the continents are \nclose-commercially as well as culturally. Our concerns are planetary, \nbeyond sunrises and sunsets. Citizenship implicates us in those problems\n and perplexities, as well as in domestic ones. We cannot exercise and \nenjoy citizenship in world perspective without the right to travel \nabroad; and I see no constitutional way to curb it unless, as I said, \nthere is the power to detain.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William O. Douglas, Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. 500, 520-21 (1964) (concurring)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOf course, I believe that every child \nhas a right to decent education and shelter, food and medical care; of \ncourse, I believe that refugees from political oppression have a right \nto a haven in a free land; of course I believe that every person has a \nright to work in dignity and for a decent wage. I do believe and affirm \nthe social contract that grounds these rights. But more to the point I \nalso believe that I am commanded-that we are obligated-to realize those \nrights.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Robert M. Cover, \u201cObligation: A Jewish Jurisprudence of the Social Order,\u201d 5 Journal of Law and Religion 65, 73-74 (1988) <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAnd I take this opportunity to declare,\n that \u2026I will to my dying day oppose, with all the powers and faculties \nGod has given me, all such instruments of slavery on the one hand, and \nvillainy on the other, as this writ of assistance is. It appears to \nme\u2026the worst instrument of arbitrary power, the most destructive of \nEnglish liberty, and the fundamental principles of the constitution, \nthat ever was found in an English law-book.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 James Otis, Argument against the writs of assistance, Boston, Feb.\n 1761, quoted in John Adams, \u201cAbstract of the Argument for and against \nthe Writts of Assistance,\u201d 1761, in Legal Papers of John Adams 2:134, \n139-40 (L. Kinvin Wroth and Hiller B. Zobel eds. 1965)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cYour Honours will find in the old book,\n concerning the office of a justice of peace, precedents of general \nwarrants to search suspected houses. But in more modern books you will \nfind only special warrants to search such and such houses specially \nnamed, in which the complainant has before sworn he suspects his goods \nare concealed; and you will find it adjudged that special warrants only \nare legal. In the same manner I rely on it, that the writ prayed for in \nthis petition being general is illegal. It is a power that places the \nliberty of every man in the hands of every petty officer.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 James Otis, Argument against the writs of assistance, Boston, Feb.\n 1761, quoted in John Adams, \u201cAbstract of the Argument for and against \nthe Writts of Assistance,\u201d 1761, in Legal Papers of John Adams 2:134, \n141-42 (L. Kinvin Wroth and Hiller B. Zobel eds. 1965)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cNow one of the most essential branches \nof English liberty, is the freedom of one\u2019s house. A man\u2019s house is his \ncastle;* and while he is quiet, he is as well guarded as a prince in his\n castle. This writ [of assistance], if it should be declared legal, \nwould totally annihilate this privilege.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 James Otis, Argument against the writs of assistance, Boston, Feb.\n 1761, quoted in John Adams, \u201cAbstract of the Argument for and against \nthe Writts of Assistance,\u201d 1761, in Legal Papers of John Adams 2:134; \n142 (L. Kinvin Wroth and Hiller B. Zobel eds. 1965)<br>\n*Burton Stevenson, Home Book of Proverbs, Maxims and Familiar Phrases \n1192 (1948), traces the proverb, \u201cA man\u2019s house is his castle,\u201d back to \n1567 and notes legal usages of it by Sir Edward Coke in the 17th \ncentury.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThat general warrants, whereby an \nofficer of messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without\n evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not \nnamed, or whose offence is not particularly described and supported by \nevidence, are grievous and oppressive, and ought not to be granted.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776, \u00a7 10, in Federal and State Constitutions 7:3812, 3814 (Francis N. Thorpe ed. 1909)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It shall be unlawful for any person, \ndirectly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of \ninterstate commerce, or of the mails\u2026<br>\n(A) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud,<br>\n(B) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a\n material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the \nlight of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, \nor<br>\n(C) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates\n or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection \nwith the purchase or sale of any security.<br>\n<em>\u2013 Rule 10b-5,13 Fed. Reg. 8183-84 (1948) (codified at 17 C.F.R. \u00a7 240.10b-5)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[Definition of insider trading:] \u201cStealing too fast.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Calvin Trillin, \u201cThe Inside on Insider Trading,\u201d in If You Can\u2019t Say Something Nice 141, 143 (1987)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cHe must make instant decisions that would take months for a lawyer.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013&nbsp;Paul Harvey, on policemen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cRacial discrimination in public \neducation is unconstitutional\u2026..All provisions of federal, state or \nlocal law requiring or permitting such discrimination must yield to this\n principle.<br>\n<em>\u2013 Earl Warren, Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 298 (1955)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe hardest case we ever heard of lived\n in Arkansas. He was only fourteen years old. One night he deliberately \nmurdered his father and mother in cold blood, with a meat-axe. He was \ntried and found guilty. The Judge drew on his black cap, and in a voice \nchoked with emotion asked the young prisoner if he had anything to say \nbefore the sentence of the Court was passed on him\u2026.\u201dWhy, no,\u201d replied \nthe prisoner, \u201cI think I haven\u2019t, though I hope yer Honor will show some\n consideration FOR THE FEELINGS OF A POOR ORPHAN!\u201d \u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Artemus Ward, \u201cA Hard Case,\u201d in Artemus Ward in London 183, 183-84 (1867) <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI\u2019m often asked why there is such a \ngreat variation among sentences imposed by Texas judges. I can only \nquote the Texas judge who was asked why a killer sometimes doesn\u2019t even \nget indicted and a cattle thief can get ten years. The judge answered: \n\u201cA lot of fellows ought to be shot, but we don\u2019t have any cows that need\n stealin\u2019.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Pearcy Foreman, quoted in Michael Dorman, King of the Courtroom 104 (1969)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOyez, oyez, oyez! All persons having \nbusiness before the honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States, \nare admonished to draw near and give their attention, for the court is \nnow sitting. God save the United States and this honorable Court.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Marshal\u2019s cry at the opening of public sessions of the United States Supreme Court<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cEqual Justice Under Law.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Inscription on West Portico of Supreme Court Building, Washington, D.C.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cJustice the Guardian of Liberty.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Inscription on East Portico of Supreme Court Building, Washington, D.C.&nbsp;<\/em><em>Court<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201c[We\u2019ll] never really know how many brothers-in-law were \n\u2018accidentally kilt\u2019 by their kin who were holding their shotgun and \nstepping over a fence at the same time.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Robert Meriweather, Professor of Political Science, Education and History and Dean of Students at Hendrix College (1959-1993)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cKnowing Master Huckaback to be a man of\n his word, as well as one who would have others so, I was careful to be \nin good time the next morning . . . \u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2013 <em>R.D. Blackmore, Lorna Doone<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cJustice the Guardian of Liberty.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Inscription on East Portico of Supreme Court Building, Washington, D.C.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAnything less than full justice is cruelty.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u2013&nbsp;<em>William Penn<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cYour brand is your promise to the consumer. It\u2019s your reputation. \nIt\u2019s the encapsulation of your core values. . .When someone attempts to \nsteal our brand it\u2019s personal, as though some part of my family has been\n assaulted.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Doug Shafer, A Vineyard In Napa<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here this extraordinary man \n[Charles Townsend], then Chancellor of the Exchequer, found himself in \ngreat straits. To please universally was the object of his life; but to \ntax and to please, no more than to love and to be wise, is not given to \nmen. However, he attempted it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Edmund Burke, Speech on American \nTaxation, 19 April 1774, in Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke 2:409,\n 454 (Paul Langford ed. 1981) <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOur new Constitution is now \nestablished, and has an appearance that promises permanency; but in this\n world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.*\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Benjamin Franklin, Letter to Jean Baptiste Le Roy, 13 Nov. 1789, \nin Writings of Benjamin Franklin 10:69 (Albert H. Smyth ed. 1907)<br>\n*Not the man in the moon, not the groaning-board, not the speaking of \nfriar Bacon\u2019s brazen- head, not the inspiration of mother Shipton, or \nthe miracles of Dr. Faustus, things as certain as death and taxes, can \nbe more firmly believed. \u2013 Daniel Defoe, The History of the Devil, 1726,\n in Defoe\u2019s Works 3:283, 481 (1912)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI don\u2019t see why a man shouldn\u2019t pay an \ninheritance tax. If a Country is good enough to pay taxes to while you \nare living, it\u2019s good enough to pay in after you die. By the time you \ndie you should be so used to paying taxes that it would just be almost \nsecond nature to you.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Will Rogers, \u201cThey\u2019ve Got a New Dictionary at Ellis Island,\u201d 28 \nFeb. 1926, in Will Rogers\u2019 Weekly Articles 2:157, 158 (James M. \nSmallwood ed. 1980)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[Responding to a statement that \u201claws \nshould be considerate of the poor\u201d:] Not more so than of the rich. The \nlaws should be equal and just; and the poor are the last people who \nought to wish them otherwise, since they are certain to be the losers \nwhen any other principle governs\u2026.No class suffers so much by a \ndeparture from the rule, as the rich have a thousand other means of \nattaining their ends, when the way is left clear to them, by setting up \nany other master than the right.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 James Fenimore Cooper, The Chainbearer, 1845, in Complete Works of J. Fenimore Cooper 27:94-95 (1893)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe true form of the Rule against \nPerpetuities is believed to be this: \u2013 NO INTEREST SUBJECT TO A \nCONDITION PRECEDENT IS GOOD, UNLESS THE CONDITION MUST BE FULFILLED, IF \nAT ALL, WITHIN TWENTY-ONE YEARS AFTER SOME LIFE IN BEING AT THE CREATION\n OF THE INTEREST.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 John Chipman Gray, The Rule Against Perpetuities 144 (1886)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cDuring my life, and now by my will and \ncodicils, I have given considerable sums of money to promote public or \nhumanitarian causes which have had my deliberate and sympathetic \ninterest. If any of my children think excessive such gifts of mine \noutside of my family, I ask them to remember not only the merit of the \ncauses and the corresponding usefulness of the gifts but also the \ndominating ideals of my life.<br>\nThey should never forget the dangers which unfortunately attend the \ninheritance of large fortunes, even though the money come from the \npainstaking affections of a father. I beg of them to remember that such \ndanger lies not only in the obvious temptation to enervating luxury, but\n in the inducement . . . to withdraw from the wholesome duty of \nvigorous, serious, useful work. In my opinion a life not largely \ndedicated to such work cannot be happy and honorable; And to such it is \nmy earnest hope-and will be to my death-that my children shall, so far \nas their strength permits, be steadfastly devoted.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Joseph Pulitzer, Will, in James Wyman Barrett, Joseph Pulitzer and His World 295-96 (1941)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAnd do as adversaries do in law \u2013 Strive mightily, but eat and drink as friends.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 William Shakespeare, The Taming of the Shrew, act I, scene ii<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cInstead, I want to see a mighty flood of justice, a river of righteous living that will never run dry.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 The Holy Bible \u2013 Amos 5:24<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIn the heart of every lawyer, worthy of\n the name, there burns a deep ambition so to bear himself that the \nprofession may be stronger by reason of his passage through its ranks, \nand that he may leave the law itself a better instrument of human \njustice than he found it.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 John W. Davis<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI do solemnly swear or affirm:<br>\nI will support the Constitution of the United States and the \nConstitution of the State of Arkansas, and I will faithfully perform the\n duties of attorney at law.<br>\nI will maintain the respect and courtesy due to courts of justice, judicial officers, and those who assist them.<br>\nI will, to the best of my ability, abide by the Model Rules of \nProfessional Conduct and any other standards of ethics proclaimed by the\n courts, and in doubtful cases I will attempt to abide by the spirit of \nthose ethical rules and precepts of honor and fair play.<br>\nTo opposing parties and their counsel, I pledge fairness, integrity, and\n civility, not only in court, but also in all written and oral \ncommunications.<br>\nI will not reject, from any consideration personal to myself, the cause of the impoverished, the defenseless, or the oppressed.<br>\nI will endeavor always to advance the cause of justice and to defend and\n to keep inviolate the rights of all persons whose trust is conferred \nupon me as an attorney at law.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Oath administered to new attorneys in Arkansas<br>\n<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe will either find a way, or make one.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Hannibal<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIn the middle of difficulty lies opportunity.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Albert Einstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI have lived my life, and I have fought\n my battles, not against the weak and the poor \u2013 anybody can do that \u2013 \nbut against power, against injustice, against oppression, and I have \nasked no odds from them, and I never shall.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Clarence S. Darrow, Defense against charge of jury bribing in \nMcNamara Case, 1912, in Attorney for the Damned 491, 497 (Arthur \nWeinberg ed. 1957)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe cannot not be here. People look to us.\u201d<br>\n<em>-Mari Wright, Executive Director of the Southwest Georgia Chapter of the American Red Cross.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe law favors farmers.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 an old folk saying<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201c\u2026There nothing more expensive than a bad lawyer\u201d.<br>\n<em>-Mike Gowen<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.<br>\n<em>\u2013 Albert Einstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In matters of truth and justice, there \nis no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning\n people are all the same.<br>\n<em>\u2013 Albert Einstein<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt\u2019s never about the opponent or who we\u2019re facing. . . . Coach likes\n to say they\u2019re faceless \u2013 and they are. It\u2019s about us and about what we\n do and how we take everything on the field. It doesn\u2019t matter who we \nplay. We\u2019re trying to play the way we\u2019re capable of playing.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 Alabama senior quarterback AJ McCarron, quoting Coach Nick Saban<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Men of few words are the best men.<br>\n<em>\u2013 William Shakespeare<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This report, by its very length, defends itself against the risk of being read.<br>\n<em>\u2013 Sir Winston Churchhill<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I have made this [letter] longer, because I have not had the time to make it shorter.<br>\n<em>\u2013 French writer and mathematician Blaise Pascal<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"http:\/\/ggreen.com\/images\/stories\/gGreen.com_Funny_Order.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Funny Order from Kenton, KY Circuit Court<\/a><br>\n<em>\u2013 Click to download PDF<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201c[W]hat many of those who oppose the use\n of juries in civil trials seem to ignore [is that t]he founders of our \nNation considered the right of trial by jury in civil cases an important\n bulwark against tyranny and corruption, a safeguard too precious to be \nleft to the whim of the sovereign, or, it might be added, to that of the\n judiciary.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Chief Justice William Rehnquist<br>\nin Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 343 (1979)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cMen are never so likely to settle a question rightly as when they discuss it freely.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Thomas Babington Macaulay<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere was not a member of the \nConstitutional Convention who had the least objection to what is \ncontended for by the advocates for a Bill of Rights and trial by jury.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 George Washington (1788)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is through trial by jury that the \npeople share in government, a consideration which ought to make our \nlegislators very cautious how they take away this mode of trial by new, \ntrifling and vexatious enactments.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Lord John Russell, Prime Minister of England (1823)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhat individual can so well assess the \namount of damages which a plaintiff ought to recover for an injury he \nhas received than an intelligent jury?\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Henry Peter Brougham, Lord Chancellor of England (1828)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe law of England has established \ntrial by judge and jury in the conviction that it is the mode best \ncalculated to ascertain the truth.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Jeremy Bentham, English Philosopher (1832)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe civil jury is the most effective \nform of sovereignty of the people. It defies the aggressions of time and\n man. During the reigns of Henry VIII (1509-1547) and Elizabeth I \n(1158-1603), the civil jury did in reality save the liberties of \nEngland.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (1835)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe jury system is the handmaid of \nfreedom. It takes on the spirit of liberty, and grows with the progress \nof constitutional government. Rome, Sparta and Carthage fell because \nthey did not know it, let not England and America fall because they \nthrew it away.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Charles S. May, Address to the Michigan Law School (1875)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIn the Declaration of Independence, the\n King of Great Britain was arraigned before the world for depriving us \nof trial by jury. This language evinces the purpose of our \nrepresentatives to risk their lives and their fortunes to secure the \nancient right of trial by jury.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Justice Alphonso C. Avery of North Carolina (1892)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIn the jury box, no less than in the \npolling booth, every day the American way of life is given its rebirth. \nAmerican jurymen are the custodians and guarantors of the democratic \nideal.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Justice Bernard Botein of New York (1946)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe more I see of trial by judge, the more highly I think of trial by jury.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Australian King\u2019s Counsel B. R. Wise (1948)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThrough 500 years of human history the \njury trial has been regarded as an unalienable right cherished in the \nthinking of freedom-seeking peoples. It remains today a refuse against \nall those little tyrannies plotted behind hypocritical fronts in \nwell-respected places theoretically dedicated to the preservation of \nbasic civil liberties.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Judge William J. Palmer of California (1958)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIn the minds of American colonists, \ntrial by jury was the firmest barrier of English liberty; it survives \ntoday as the voice of the people.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Arthur Schlesinger, The Birth of the Nation (1968)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe most persistent hate is that which doth degenerate from love.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Map, De Nugis Curialium, 245<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201c[N]o man\u2019s life, liberty or fortune is safe while the legislature is in session.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Benjamin Franklin<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe right of trial by jury in civil cases is fundamental to our \nhistory and jurisprudence. The founders of our nation considered it an \nimportant bulwark against tyranny and corruption, a safeguard too \nprecious to be left to the whim of the sovereign.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>\u2013 U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist (1979)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe concept of the jury system is as close as any society has ever come to true democracy.\u201d<br>\n<em> -Paula Di Perna, Faces of American Justice (1984)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cPlaintiff respectfully demands trial by jury and tenders the required jury fee\u201d.<br>\n<em>\u2013 Non-parenthetical requirement in every complaint alleging personal injury or wrongful death, Law Offices of Gary Green<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cA jury consists of twelve persons chosen to decide who has the better lawyer.\u201d<br>\n<em>\u2013 Robert Frost <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This compendium of Legal Quotes was first published at gGreen.com on March 22, 1995. It was last updated on December 17, 2018. It does not purport to be a list of all the Legal Quotes I have ever heard, just the ones I like. I have even excluded some quotes that gave me pause when [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-960","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"MAS Law Firm","author_link":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/?author=1"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"This compendium of Legal Quotes was first published at gGreen.com on March 22, 1995. It was last updated on December 17, 2018. It does not purport to be a list of all the Legal Quotes I have ever heard, just the ones I like. I have even excluded some quotes that gave me pause when&hellip;","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/960","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=960"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/960\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1890,"href":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/960\/revisions\/1890"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/musangalaadvocates.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=960"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}